Shares
0

Related stories

Indonesia - Efforts to help Indonesian oil palm smallholders comply with sustainability standards and “good agricultural practices” may not succeed if these do not better account for smallholder diversity, according to newly published research.

Independent oil palm smallholders are particularly struggling to comply with the increasingly strict rules in the sector, says the research article: Certification, good agricultural practice and smallholder heterogeneity: Differentiated pathways for resolving compliance gaps in the Indonesian oil palm sector. The article estimates that only 2.4 percent of independent smallholders in its research sites in Central and West Kalimantan are currently able to comply with the requirements of the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certification system.

The large compliance gap is a serious challenge to reducing the impact of oil palm on the environment. Independent smallholders often don’t have the same opportunity to access technical and bureaucratic support and production inputs. Many consequently lack the capacity and resources to formalize their oil palm operations and adopt good agricultural practices. Independent oil palm smallholders are therefore comparatively unproductive, attaining less than 60 percent of their yield potential on average, says the study, led by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Watch this short video that further examines the challenges facing independent smallholders:

“To develop the right policies to address the huge compliance gap, you do first need to better understand your smallholders”

George Schoneveld

To compensate, certain smallholders may expand into sensitive ecological areas containing natural forests and peat soils. Since independent smallholders are less visible to regulators and activists than corporations, their expansion practices have until recently received comparatively little attention. This is slowly changing as smallholders over the next decade look to rival private plantation companies as the sector’s largest producer group by acreage. Since many companies are becoming eager to demonstrate their commitment to eliminating deforestation and peatland conversion from their entire supply chains and not just their own plantations, the spotlight is increasingly becoming focused on this growing but comparatively under-regulated producer group.

Concerns are being raised over how corporate sustainability commitments are likely to affect independent smallholders. Because monitoring and tracing the origins of smallholder produce is complicated and expensive, many companies are reevaluating their smallholder sourcing strategies. This could pose a serious threat to smallholder market access in future. Enhancing smallholder compliance with sustainability standards such as Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil could help prevent this.

Many companies looking to ‘green’ their supply chains will be more willing to invest in smallholders compliant of standards like ISPO, says research lead George Schoneveld, Senior Scientist with CIFOR. Since public support is also more accessible to compliant smallholders, helping smallholders meet the requirements of sustainability standards will not only protect their livelihoods, but also increase their access to the tools needed to become more productive and profitable on their existing plots.

“To develop the right policies to address the huge compliance gap, you do first need to better understand your smallholders,” warns Schoneveld. His research team, whose study has just been published in the journal Global Environmental Change, has proposed six types of independent smallholders, each likely to respond to very different approaches.

The different types of palm oil smallholders identified in the study:

Subsistence farmers: with little education, no prior experience with oil palm, often reliant on the crop as their only source of income;
Early adopters: little education but experienced with oil palm; often growing oil palm longer than others, also cultivating other plantation crops;
Migrant laborers: with experience as workers on large plantations, understand good agriculture practices, technical fundamentals and legal requirements, oil palm specialists;
Migrant farmers: little prior experience, late adopters, also cultivating other plantation crops;
Entrepreneurs: little farm experience, livelihoods revolve around small-scale enterprise, comparatively large farms, see oil palm as an investment opportunity;
Local elites: white-collar employees, little farm experience, large farms, reliant on hired labor, sometimes adopting more speculative strategies.

Appreciating this diversity will help NGOs, government agencies, or the private sector to better tailor intervention support to the compliance challenges unique to each group. The article for example, suggests that early adopters and migrant laborers are low hanging fruit for interventions looking to enhance smallholder compliance rates, since these farmers face fewer compliance barriers once access to bureaucratic support is improved. Subsistence and migrant farmers are conversely confronted by significant capacity and resource constraints, and would therefore benefit from targeted technical assistance and a staggered approach to ISPO compliance.

Since entrepreneurs and local elites are comparatively well-educated, resourced and embedded in the local bureaucracy, farmers in these groups are unlikely to demand extensive external support. Rather “local resistance [to measures] that threaten the status quo is inevitable, as influential local actors complicit in illicit land trading, regulatory evasion and illegal land encroachments look to protect their discretionary authorities, oil palm investments and sources of personal accumulation,” notes the study.

   Oil palm workers travel to the field Icaro Cooke Vieira/CIFOR

That said, value chain and institutional components should also be included across intervention strategies, adds Schoneveld. This can help to buttress those interventions and provide the necessary enabling structures that can facilitate and incentivize compliance with ISPO at scale. In that way, ISPO could, in turn, become an ‘important stepping stone’ for smallholders to eventually take part in more comprehensive schemes such as the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), notes Schoneveld.

It won’t be easy to convince often-skeptical smallholders of the advantages to compliance, warns the study. It suggests that policies and programs aimed at encouraging compliance should be based on the significance of palm oil to a smallholder’s livelihood, rather than merely oil palm plot size. “(For) the purpose of prioritizing support that is both effective and achieves societal co-benefits, the role of oil palm in livelihood portfolios and strategies and the nature of smallholders’ sectoral ties could be vastly more meaningful and useful indicators,” says Schoneveld.

 

The research team led by Schoneveld also included: Selma van der Haar, Research Officer, CIFOR; Dian Ekowati, Senior Research Officer, CIFOR; Agus Andrianto, Research Assistant, CIFOR; Heru Komarudin, Senior Research Officer, CIFOR; Beni Okarda, Senior Research Officer, CIFOR; Idsert Jelsma, PhD candidate, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; Pablo Pacheco, Global Forest Lead, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Washington, D.C.

 

This research was supported by United States Agency for International Development through the Governing Oil Palm Landscapes for Sustainability (GOLS) Project and was conducted as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (CRP-FTA). That is led by CIFOR in partnership with Bioversity International, CATIE, CIRAD, ICRAF, INBAR and TBI. Enumeration support came from staff and students of SPKS, University of Palangka Raya and University of Tanjungpura.
Copyright policy:
We want you to share Forests News content, which is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This means you are free to redistribute our material for non-commercial purposes. All we ask is that you give Forests News appropriate credit and link to the original Forests News content, indicate if changes were made, and distribute your contributions under the same Creative Commons license. You must notify Forests News if you repost, reprint or reuse our materials by contacting forestsnews@cgiar.org.